ringo747
Location : Near RAF Aldergrove
|
Subject: Images in signature 2008-11-21, 07:31 |
|
|
Maybe its just me but I really am not a big fan of these.. if everyone has an image in their signature you have soooo much screen space wasted on a lengthy post - it just does nothing for improving the readability of the forums. I think signatures should be set to allow a few lines of text only. Images are what avatars are for. Anyone agree? When I'm on laptop screen I like everything to be as condensed as possible but needless scrolling due to large signatures is a bit annoying.
Just one more thing... the images in the forums subsections titles look terrible - I think everything would look more slick if it was purely a list of sections - images seem to interupt the flow here.
This maybe seems like a severe dose of nitpicking but with working in an environment where web usability and accessibility standards are very important I think it is worth a mention!
|
|
Flaps
Moderator
Location : 478 miles NNW of Skegness.
Spotter Watch Member : No
|
Subject: Re: Images in signature 2008-11-21, 08:05 |
|
|
An image helps to fill the huge gap under most posts,on large posts it does waste space.
|
|
ringo747
Location : Near RAF Aldergrove
|
Subject: Re: Images in signature 2008-11-21, 08:52 |
|
|
Yeah I just think that it breaks the distinguishing line between one post and the next and breaks the flow of readability. I guess nobody else will understand but sure!
|
|
pikey01
Moderator
Location : In a layby
|
Subject: Re: Images in signature 2008-11-21, 08:55 |
|
|
Ringo, I do agree with you about the forum subsection images and have raised the point with the other Mods.
|
|
dervish
Location : various
|
Subject: Re: Images in signature 2009-01-20, 02:54 |
|
|
- ringo747 wrote:
- Maybe its just me but I really am not a big fan of these.. if everyone has an image in their signature you have soooo much screen space wasted on a lengthy post - it just does nothing for improving the readability of the forums. I think signatures should be set to allow a few lines of text only. Images are what avatars are for. Anyone agree? When I'm on laptop screen I like everything to be as condensed as possible but needless scrolling due to large signatures is a bit annoying.
Just one more thing... the images in the forums subsections titles look terrible - I think everything would look more slick if it was purely a list of sections - images seem to interupt the flow here.
This maybe seems like a severe dose of nitpicking but with working in an environment where web usability and accessibility standards are very important I think it is worth a mention! You could always block the photos in your browser? That way you're happy and so are the people who like signatures longer than their posts? I also block avatars.
|
|
Sponsored content
|
Subject: Re: Images in signature |
|
|
|
|